[SMM Analysis] Maximizing Resource Utilization in Battery Recycling  

Published: Dec 16, 2024 10:57
Source: SMM
In recent years, the topic of "replacing a battery being more expensive than buying a new car" has been widely discussed in China's NEV sector.

In recent years, the topic of "replacing a battery being more expensive than buying a new car" has been widely discussed in China's NEV sector. Many NEV owners have expressed concerns about battery lifespan on social media. The first batch of NEV owners who purchased pure EVs in China have successively shared their battery replacement bills, from early Tesla owners to recent Mercedes-Benz owners. These discussions have drawn widespread attention to the lifespan and residual value of NEV batteries. Since 2016, China has implemented an 8-year or 120,000-kilometer warranty standard for passenger car power batteries, and this year marks the eighth year. This means that starting this year, a certain number of power batteries will reach the end of their warranty period annually.

Currently, there are three main recycling models in the industry: led by power battery producers, automakers, or third-party companies. Each model has its advantages and disadvantages. Recycling led by battery producers facilitates targeted resource recycling of used batteries, automakers benefit from significant channel advantages that can lower overall recycling costs, while third-party companies can help maximize battery resource utilization.

According to a research report by the Development Research Center of the State Council, as of 2023, the standardized recycling rate of NEV power batteries in China is less than 25%. The power battery recycling industry has only issued over 10 national standards and 14 industry standards. Although there are numerous enterprise standards, their authority and versatility remain weak. Therefore, the development of the used power battery industry still faces challenges such as technical difficulties and inefficient recycling channels, which require improvements in laws, regulations, and standard systems.

Currently, end-of-life power batteries are mainly utilized in two ways: cascade utilization and regeneration. When the capacity of NEV batteries is between 20% and 80%, cascade utilization is the preferred option. This involves testing, classifying, disassembling, and reassembling the batteries for use in low-speed EVs, and later in energy storage, communication base stations, streetlights, or power banks. Once the battery capacity falls below 20%-30%, it no longer holds value for cascade utilization. At this stage, the batteries are regenerated through processes such as disassembly, crushing, sorting, and smelting to extract recyclable components like precious metals and plastics. However, the cascade utilization process is highly complex and requires technological advancements and new application scenarios to improve its economic viability. On the other hand, disassembly and recycling primarily generate profits from processing, with technology and channels being the core influencing factors.

From a channel perspective, power battery recycling mainly comes from the following sources: old cars from 4S shops, scrap cars from repair shops, accident cars from insurance companies, old cars from automakers, experimental batteries from automakers, and batteries awaiting disposal from electronics factories. Such diverse sources of batteries naturally pose challenges for one-stop recycling and processing. One of the biggest difficulties in cascade utilization of end-of-life batteries is ensuring "consistency." Many companies have stated that the goal of cascade utilization is to create products, but the wide variety of brands and models of batteries makes it challenging to standardize them into uniform products. Additionally, some unqualified companies profit from crude processing of old batteries, which not only creates safety hazards but also complicates traceability management.

Amid declining profitability and severe challenges in the power battery recycling industry, representative companies of the three recycling models are currently striving to achieve profitability through technological innovation and business model transformation. In the future, industry chain alliances involving deep collaboration across the upstream and downstream of the industry chain are expected to become the mainstream model for battery recycling.

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM‘s internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or to learn more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
India to build a six-month strategic stockpile of lithium, cobalt and rare earths as demand rises
May 1, 2026 07:00
India to build a six-month strategic stockpile of lithium, cobalt and rare earths as demand rises
Read More
India to build a six-month strategic stockpile of lithium, cobalt and rare earths as demand rises
India to build a six-month strategic stockpile of lithium, cobalt and rare earths as demand rises
Amid sustained demand growth, India plans to build a strategic reserve of critical minerals including lithium, cobalt, nickel, copper and rare earths. The stockpile will be sized to cover six months of domestic consumption, aiming to guard against risks of global supply disruptions and sharp raw material price volatility. Led by India’s Ministry of Mines and Ministry of Heavy Industries, the reserve covers key raw materials essential for new energy vehicles, energy storage and the electronics sector, fields where India currently relies heavily on imports. At present, the United States, China, South Korea and other countries have already established strategic reserve systems for critical minerals.
May 1, 2026 07:00
[Geely's Gan Jiayue: Zeekr 9X to enter markets in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Europe from Q3]
Apr 30, 2026 23:00
[Geely's Gan Jiayue: Zeekr 9X to enter markets in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Europe from Q3]
Read More
[Geely's Gan Jiayue: Zeekr 9X to enter markets in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Europe from Q3]
[Geely's Gan Jiayue: Zeekr 9X to enter markets in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Europe from Q3]
On April 29, during Geely's Q1 2026 results conference, Gan Jiayue, CEO of Geely Auto Group, stated that the Zeekr 9X will be exported to the Middle East in June, launched in Central Asia in Q3, and enter the European market in Q4. Gan also revealed that the Zeekr 8X will be promoted in overseas markets from Q4 this year to Q1 next year. Data shows that in the first quarter, deliveries of the Zeekr 9X reached 22,000 units.
Apr 30, 2026 23:00
[LG Energy Solution posts Q1 operating loss of 207.8 billion won]
Apr 30, 2026 22:55
[LG Energy Solution posts Q1 operating loss of 207.8 billion won]
Read More
[LG Energy Solution posts Q1 operating loss of 207.8 billion won]
[LG Energy Solution posts Q1 operating loss of 207.8 billion won]
LG Energy Solution reported consolidated revenue of 6.6 trillion won in the first quarter, up 1.2% quarter-on-quarter (including approximately 189.8 billion won in North American production incentives). During the same period, it recorded an operating loss of 207.8 billion won. Shipments of pouch-type electric vehicle (EV) batteries declined due to inventory adjustments by major North American customers.
Apr 30, 2026 22:55